7/25/2023 0 Comments Dr gary schwartz pain management![]() In an attempt to find innovative ways to explore the impact of massage therapy, the goal of this study is to examine if the GDV device provides a sensitive bioenergetic measure of change pre–post-massage treatment and if the GDV device correlates with traditional self-report measures that represent the biological, psychological, and emotional aspects of an individual. While many outcome measures focus on a single biological system, GDV focuses on the overall bioenergetic evaluation of the state of the whole person as a single complex system. GDV image of the ionization of air molecules surrounding the fingertip.Ī recent review of research suggests the GDV device can be used for evaluating the impact of various treatment procedures, suggesting numerous correlations between GDV parameters and patients’ states post-treatment. Theoretically, it is these energy photons which cause the resultant image, and as such represent the individual’s bioenergetic field.Įxample of GDV image of fingertip. ![]() Theoretically, GDV imaging and analysis process measures quantify the biophoton emissions surrounding the finger tips, such that energy photons are emitted from the corona discharge formed as a result of the ionization of air molecules surrounding the fingertip (see Figure 1). The GDV uses modern optics, electronics, and computer processing for analyzing photon emission stimulated by a pulsed electromagnetic field. The GDV device provides a potential computerized biophysical screening of the psychophysiologic state of an individual. This research was designed to evaluate the bioenergetic effects of massage therapy in a healthy population using the gas discharge visualization (GDV) device, an electrophoton capture (EPC) measure that theoretically measures the biophoton emissions surrounding the finger tips, as an indication of one’s energetic field. the person as a whole-complex system) of massage therapy that is commonly seen in practice. The reports of these outcome measures provide an indication of the mechanisms of therapeutic massage on individual biosystems (e.g., cardiovascular, immune, etc.) however, little research has adequately demonstrated the whole-person bioenergetic effects (i.e. ![]() Physiological objective measures have focused on impacts on electrocardiogram (EKG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns, respiratory rate, pulmonary function, blood glucose, serum insulin and IGF-1 levels, natural killer cells, white blood cells, and neutrophil counts. Psychological outcome measures have been used to demonstrate changes in cortisol, norepinephrine, and serotonin levels. To support the validity of findings, previous research has relied on objective biomarkers to demonstrate effects of massage. Subjective self-reports are most commonly reported to demonstrate massage outcomes for symptoms related to perceptions of pain, tension, stress, anxiety, and well-being. Fewer studies have evaluated additional outcomes including immune function, blood flow, nausea management, and quality of sleep. The majority of literature on massage therapy focuses on associated outcomes supporting pain and tension reduction, stress and anxiety reduction, alleviating depressive symptoms, and general well-being/quality of life. There is growing evidence to suggest massage has significant effects on outcomes in diverse populations. Therapists and clients commonly refer to this therapeutic effect of massage, yet research has yet to capture the essence of this change using traditional outcome measures. ![]() Throughout the field of massage, practitioners commonly recognize a change that occurs in the person after receiving a massage treatment often referred to as an “energetic” change. Massage therapy has gained recognition for having therapeutic effects for individuals, including those with a diverse range of conditions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |